![]() ![]() The electronic version of Economic History ReviewĪuthorized users may be able to access the full text articles at this site. JSTOR provides a digital archive of the print version of Economic Each issueĪlso contains a substantial number of book reviews. Many years past a comprehensive annual list of publications on the economicĪnd social history of Great Britain and Ireland has been published. Of 'Surveys and Speculations' which are more reflective survey articles. In addition to regular papers, some issues contain contributions to a series The emphasis is on broad coverage of themes of economicĪnd social change, including their intellectual, political and cultural implications. Is pleased to publish high quality research on the economic and social history Range of methodological approaches used by economic and social historians and The Review welcomes contributions based on the full Has been published since 1927 and is one of the world's leading journals in Is edited on behalf of the Economic History Society by leading scholars. Research on all aspects of economic and social history. The Economic History Review publishes articles based on original Part II deals with the reconstruction of the gentlemanly order in the middle of the nineteenth century, when new forms of property headed by finance and services gained precedence over land, and traces the influence of this expanding sector overseas, arguing that Britain's informal influence was growing, not declining, in the late nineteenth century and that the period after 1914 was one of continuing imperialist rivalry and not merely of the management of nationalism in an era of colonial retreat. ![]() It then considered the ways in which these influences, dominated by the landed interest, shaped British history and the British presence abroad between 16. The interpretation offered emphasized the economic weight and the political power of non-industrial but still capitalist forms of enterprise in the period 1688-1945. ![]() Part I suggested a way of approaching British history which avoided the stereotypes on which both Marxist and liberal historians of imperialism have tended to rely. This article carries forward the interpretation set out in Part I, which was published in the last issue of the Review (XXXIX, 4, Nov.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |